Workspace
The calculator's own fields, action and results arrive with the verified pack when you load it. Nothing is computed in this page.
Work out the bagged render or skim a coating job needs: area at the applied thickness, priced by the manufacturer’s coverage rate, grossed for wastage.
The calculator's own fields, action and results arrive with the verified pack when you load it. Nothing is computed in this page.
The coverage rate belongs to the product, not to rendering in general. Two bags from rival ranges laid at identical thickness consume different masses, because one is lightened with fillers and the other is not — which is why the rate is a required input read from the datasheet rather than a default this page could honestly supply.
Thickness multiplies the demand linearly, and thin work punishes small errors in it. On a coat of two or three millimetres, half a millimetre of extra build across the whole wall is a large fraction more material — so the thickness entered should be what the trowel will really leave, not the brochure’s minimum.
The ten-millimetre ceiling is the boundary of what a finish coat is. A skim is a skin that follows the surface beneath it; anything needing more build than that is a backing-coat system with its own products and its own rates, and the engine refuses to price one as if it were the other.
Wastage on thin-coat work is mostly time’s doing: mixed material stiffening in the bucket past its working life, the film sanded back off after feathering, what the hawk drops. The default twentieth suits steady work on a sound background; a first attempt or a hot day earns more.
Bags are the answer because bags are the unit of purchase and of mixing. The engine reports the material mass with wastage applied and the unrounded count of bags it fills — the fraction is the honest part, the difference between one more bag and a firmer wastage judgement.
The pack’s declared vector: forty square metres coated at three millimetres, a datasheet rate of one point two kilograms per square metre per millimetre, twenty-five-kilogram bags, and the default twentieth of wastage.
Two figures come back: the material mass once wastage is applied, and the unrounded bags that mass fills. Read the fraction on the bag count before ordering — on thin coats it is the thickness judgement, more than the area, that decides whether it rounds up.
Every figure in this example is produced by the certified engine when the calculator loads, checked against the signed pack’s declared test vectors; nothing on this page stores an answer. Halve the thickness and watch the order halve with it — on a skim, the millimetre is the price.
The surface the coat will cover, in square metres, with openings deducted — elevation area for render, wall and ceiling area for internal skim.
The thickness the trowel will really leave, as an average. Thin coats magnify this figure’s errors, so honesty here matters more than anywhere.
The manufacturer’s stated consumption, in kilograms per square metre per millimetre, read from the datasheet of the specific bag being bought. The one fact this take-off cannot supply itself.
The size the product is bagged in. Finishing plasters and renders commonly come smaller than cement, and the bag count scales from whatever is entered.
The percentage added for mix that stiffens past its working life, feathering losses and sanding-back. A judgement about the crew and the day as much as the wall.
Manufacturer coverage-rate estimating convention (Chudley and Greeno, Building Construction Handbook)
Material mass as area times applied thickness times the manufacturer’s stated rate, grossed up by the wastage percentage; the bag count as that mass divided by the bag size, reported unrounded.
Quantity reference to be verified against the datasheet of the product actually bought; product selection and background preparation are never determined here. The signed pack carries its own citation, and the page reports the verification state of the release it mounted.